ISSN 0303-5212
 

Original Research 
RMJ. 2023; 48(3): 711-714


Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes

Ban Amer Mousa, Vian Hussam Almansi Alqani, Hadeel Jalil Ameen Awadh.

Abstract
Objective: To examine the influence of consanguineous marriage on pregnancy outcomes and highlight the factors, such as rural region residency, unemployment, and poor education.
Methodology: This prospective study used a questionnaire for women in Babylon teaching hospital and some private clinics from the 1st of June 2021 to the 1st of July 2022. Randomly, 500 women were taken, 150 of them had history of consanguineous marriage.
Results: Mean age of women was 30 years; 77% were rural, 4.1% were employed, 21.6% had congenital abnormalities, 8.8% experienced recurrent miscarriages, and 10.1% suffered unexplained intrauterine mortality. 350 had no history of consanguineous marriage, a mean age of 34, 46.6% resided in rural areas, 79.3% were employed, 8.2% had congenital abnormalities, 3.4% had recurrent miscarriages, and 4% experienced unexplained intrauterine mortality. Consanguinity and rural living (p=0.0001) and employment (p=0.0001) were substantially correlated. Consanguinity was correlated with congenital abnormalities (p=0.0001), recurrent miscarriage (p=0.022), and unexplained intrauterine death (p=0.036).
Conclusion: Consanguineous marriage is prevalent in our region (30%), especially in rural areas and jobless groups, which increases prenatal abnormalities, miscarriage, and intrauterine mortality.

Key words: Consanguineous marriage, congenital malformations, recurrent miscarriage, unexplained intrauterine death.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Ban Amer Mousa
Articles by Vian Hussam Almansi Alqani
Articles by Hadeel Jalil Ameen Awadh
on Google
on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Mousa BA, Alqani VHA, Awadh HJA. Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. RMJ. 2023; 48(3): 711-714.


Web Style

Mousa BA, Alqani VHA, Awadh HJA. Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=141783 [Access: September 03, 2023].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Mousa BA, Alqani VHA, Awadh HJA. Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. RMJ. 2023; 48(3): 711-714.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Mousa BA, Alqani VHA, Awadh HJA. Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. RMJ. (2023), [cited September 03, 2023]; 48(3): 711-714.



Harvard Style

Mousa, B. A., Alqani, . V. H. A. & Awadh, . H. J. A. (2023) Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. RMJ, 48 (3), 711-714.



Turabian Style

Mousa, Ban Amer, Vian Hussam Almansi Alqani, and Hadeel Jalil Ameen Awadh. 2023. Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. Rawal Medical Journal, 48 (3), 711-714.



Chicago Style

Mousa, Ban Amer, Vian Hussam Almansi Alqani, and Hadeel Jalil Ameen Awadh. "Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes." Rawal Medical Journal 48 (2023), 711-714.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Mousa, Ban Amer, Vian Hussam Almansi Alqani, and Hadeel Jalil Ameen Awadh. "Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes." Rawal Medical Journal 48.3 (2023), 711-714. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Mousa, B. A., Alqani, . V. H. A. & Awadh, . H. J. A. (2023) Consanguineous marriages and poor pregnancy outcomes. Rawal Medical Journal, 48 (3), 711-714.