Original Research | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RMJ. 2012; 37(1): 38-41 Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term Naushaba Malik.
|
How to Cite this Article |
Pubmed Style Naushaba Malik. Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. RMJ. 2012; 37(1): 38-41. Web Style Naushaba Malik. Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=6073 [Access: December 04, 2023]. AMA (American Medical Association) Style Naushaba Malik. Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. RMJ. 2012; 37(1): 38-41. Vancouver/ICMJE Style Naushaba Malik. Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. RMJ. (2012), [cited December 04, 2023]; 37(1): 38-41. Harvard Style Naushaba Malik (2012) Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. RMJ, 37 (1), 38-41. Turabian Style Naushaba Malik. 2012. Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. Rawal Medical Journal, 37 (1), 38-41. Chicago Style Naushaba Malik. "Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term." Rawal Medical Journal 37 (2012), 38-41. MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style Naushaba Malik. "Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term." Rawal Medical Journal 37.1 (2012), 38-41. Print. APA (American Psychological Association) Style Naushaba Malik (2012) Comparison of two different methods for estimation of fetal weight at term. Rawal Medical Journal, 37 (1), 38-41. |