Open Access and Peer-reviewed
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal News & Announcements


Original Research 
RMJ. 2021; 46(2): 469-472


Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain

Dileep Kumar Lohana, Umair Ahmad, Faiza Sharif, Ashfaq Ahmad, Amir Ali Geilani, Salwa Atta.

Abstract
Objective: To compare effectiveness of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) and McKenzie extension exercises to reduce disability in patients with acute non-specific low back pain.
Methodology: This was double blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at Gosha E Shifa Hospital, Lahore. We randomized 84 patients through computer number generator and were allocated into group A and B by concealment through envelope. The questionnaire was based on two primary outcome measures i.e. Back performance Scale for ADL’s and Owestry Disability Index for functional disability. Patients were assessed before-treatment i.e. t0, mid treatment i.e. t1 and after treatment i.e. t2.
Results: Mean age for patients in group A was 41.97±8.16 years and in group it was 45.02±7.29 years. Out of 84 patients, 45.24% were males and 54.76% females. Functional abilities measured by Back Performance Scale was found to be 5.02±2.05 and 6.78±3.3 at post treatment level (p=0.00). Back Performance Scale results at 8th week follow up for both groups were 2.15±1.64 and 3.16±2.43, respectively (p=0.03). Functional disability measured by Owestry disability Index was 35.0%±2.21% and 34.3±2.37% at post treatment level (p=0.16). Owestry Disability Index results at 8th week follow up for both groups were 23.62±2.8% and 22.64±2.4%, respectively (p=0.11).
Conclusion: McKenzie exercises and SNAGs both were equally effective in improving pain whereas McKenzie exercises improved functional abilities better than SNAGs.

Key words: McKenzie extension exercises, apophyseal glides, mulligan.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Dileep Kumar Lohana
Articles by Umair Ahmad
Articles by Faiza Sharif
Articles by Ashfaq Ahmad
Articles by Amir Ali Geilani
Articles by Salwa Atta
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Lohana DK, Ahmad U, Sharif F, Ahmad A, Geilani AA, Atta S. Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. RMJ. 2021; 46(2): 469-472.


Web Style

Lohana DK, Ahmad U, Sharif F, Ahmad A, Geilani AA, Atta S. Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. http://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=134611 [Access: June 12, 2021].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Lohana DK, Ahmad U, Sharif F, Ahmad A, Geilani AA, Atta S. Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. RMJ. 2021; 46(2): 469-472.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Lohana DK, Ahmad U, Sharif F, Ahmad A, Geilani AA, Atta S. Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. RMJ. (2021), [cited June 12, 2021]; 46(2): 469-472.



Harvard Style

Lohana, D. K., Ahmad, . U., Sharif, . F., Ahmad, . A., Geilani, . A. A. & Atta, . S. (2021) Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. RMJ, 46 (2), 469-472.



Turabian Style

Lohana, Dileep Kumar, Umair Ahmad, Faiza Sharif, Ashfaq Ahmad, Amir Ali Geilani, and Salwa Atta. 2021. Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. Rawal Medical Journal, 46 (2), 469-472.



Chicago Style

Lohana, Dileep Kumar, Umair Ahmad, Faiza Sharif, Ashfaq Ahmad, Amir Ali Geilani, and Salwa Atta. "Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain." Rawal Medical Journal 46 (2021), 469-472.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Lohana, Dileep Kumar, Umair Ahmad, Faiza Sharif, Ashfaq Ahmad, Amir Ali Geilani, and Salwa Atta. "Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain." Rawal Medical Journal 46.2 (2021), 469-472. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Lohana, D. K., Ahmad, . U., Sharif, . F., Ahmad, . A., Geilani, . A. A. & Atta, . S. (2021) Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. Rawal Medical Journal, 46 (2), 469-472.








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


Indexed in WHO Index Medicus IMEMR, Emromedex, Pakmedinet, ExtraMED,  Scopus and Web of Science

                     Approved by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan 


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES
STATEMENTS

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.

The articles in Rawal Medical Journal are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.