Service by

Home Journal Issues Instructions for Authors Editorial Board About Journal Aims & Scope


Original Research 
RMJ. 2018; 43(3): 444-447


Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy

Omaima Zubair Khan, Muhammad Hamza Khan, Sara Batool, Rahat Akhtar.

Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of misoprostol oral and vaginal when administered for induction of labor at term live pregnancy.

Methodology: This randomized control trial was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Nishtar hospital, Multan, Pakistan from February 22, 2017 to July 22, 2017. Chi square test was applied for effect modification or association of outcome variables with effect modifiers. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.

Results: A total of 272 pregnant women were included, divided into two equal groups, 136 in each i.e. sublingual group and Vaginal group. Time interval between starting misoprostol and delivery was 361.71.91 minutes in sublingual group and 396.081.41minutes in vaginal group (p=0.000). Strong association was found with time interval between starting misoprostol and delivery.

Conclusion: Sublingual misoprostol is more effective in induction of labor at term pregnancy with live fetus as compared to vaginal misoprostol in terms of time of interval between starting to delivery. It had minimum complications and easy to administered as compared to vaginal administration.

Key words: Misoprostol, term pregnancy, induction of labor.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Export to
Export to
Related Records
 Articles by Omaima Zubair Khan
Articles by Muhammad Hamza Khan
Articles by Sara Batool
Articles by Rahat Akhtar
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 82
Downloaded: 65
Cited: 0


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. RMJ. 2018; 43(3): 444-447.


Web Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. http://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=277486 [Access: September 22, 2018].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. RMJ. 2018; 43(3): 444-447.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. RMJ. (2018), [cited September 22, 2018]; 43(3): 444-447.



Harvard Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar (2018) Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. RMJ, 43 (3), 444-447.



Turabian Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. 2018. Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. Rawal Medical Journal, 43 (3), 444-447.



Chicago Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. "Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy." Rawal Medical Journal 43 (2018), 444-447.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar. "Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy." Rawal Medical Journal 43.3 (2018), 444-447. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Omaima Zubair Khan| Muhammad Hamza Khan| Sara Batool| Rahat Akhtar (2018) Comparing the efficacy of sublingual misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term live pregnancy. Rawal Medical Journal, 43 (3), 444-447.




Instructions for Authors

AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed In

WHO Index Medicus IMEMR,
Emromedex,
Pakmedinet,
ExtraMED and
Scopus

Approved by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan and Pakistan Medical and Dental Council



The articles in Rawal Medical Journal are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.