Open Access and Peer-reviewed
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal News & Announcements


Original Research 
RMJ. 2012; 37(2): 172-175


Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf.

Abstract
Background: A large number of specimens are submitted to histopathology departments for microscopic examination where it is felt that this examination is inappropriately time consuming, costly, and contributes little if anything to the further management of the patients.
Objectives: To assess that the histologic examination of macroscopically normal looking gallbladder specimens is really needed.
Study Design: Descriptive study.
Setting: IIMCT-Railway General hospital, Rawalpindi.
Methods: All cholecystectomy specimens submitted to the department of histopathology at the Railway Hospital IIMCT, during a 5 years period from January 2006 to December 2010, were included in the study regardless of age and sex. The total number of blocks submitted was 400 (average 1.2 blocks/ specimen).
Specimen reports were retrieved by computer search. The clinical history provided on the specimen request form was recorded. The case notes were retrieved in cases of malignancy to evaluate preoperative ultrasound and intraoperative findings. Macroscopic findings by a consultant pathologist were recorded from the reports. The subsequent microscopic findings from these cases were reassessed to determine whether any lesions of clinical importance were identified.

Results: A total of 326 cases of gallbladder specimens were subjected to histopathological examination within the study period. Twenty seven percent ( n=88) were males and 73 %( n=238) were females with age range from 54 years to 80 years (average 62 years).
Chronic cholecystitis was the most common findings with about 84.7% of cases (n=276), followed by acute cholecystitis14.7% (n=48). Only two of the gall bladders showed adenocarcinoma (0.6%), which was preoperatively diagnosed on ultrasound findings and suspected on gross/macroscopic examination.

Conclusions: Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal cholecystectomy specimens does not contribute to patient management and a more selective approach should be considered. This will reduce the burden on pathology departments, along with considerable cost containment.

Key words: Cholecystectomy, histopathology, gall bladder carcinoma.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Madiha Sajjad
Articles by Rehan Ahmed Khan
Articles by Samina Iltaf
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 4466
Downloaded: 718
Cited: 0


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ. 2012; 37(2): 172-175.


Web Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. http://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=12511 [Access: October 16, 2019].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ. 2012; 37(2): 172-175.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ. (2012), [cited October 16, 2019]; 37(2): 172-175.



Harvard Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf (2012) Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ, 37 (2), 172-175.



Turabian Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. 2012. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. Rawal Medical Journal, 37 (2), 172-175.



Chicago Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. "Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?." Rawal Medical Journal 37 (2012), 172-175.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. "Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?." Rawal Medical Journal 37.2 (2012), 172-175. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf (2012) Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. Rawal Medical Journal, 37 (2), 172-175.








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


Indexed in WHO Index Medicus IMEMR, Emromedex, Pakmedinet, ExtraMED and Scopus

  Approved by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan and Pakistan Medical and Dental Council


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES
STATEMENTS

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.

The articles in Rawal Medical Journal are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.