ISSN 0303-5212
 

Original Research 
RMJ. 2012; 37(2): 172-175


Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf.

Abstract
Background: A large number of specimens are submitted to histopathology departments for microscopic examination where it is felt that this examination is inappropriately time consuming, costly, and contributes little if anything to the further management of the patients.
Objectives: To assess that the histologic examination of macroscopically normal looking gallbladder specimens is really needed.
Study Design: Descriptive study.
Setting: IIMCT-Railway General hospital, Rawalpindi.
Methods: All cholecystectomy specimens submitted to the department of histopathology at the Railway Hospital IIMCT, during a 5 years period from January 2006 to December 2010, were included in the study regardless of age and sex. The total number of blocks submitted was 400 (average 1.2 blocks/ specimen).
Specimen reports were retrieved by computer search. The clinical history provided on the specimen request form was recorded. The case notes were retrieved in cases of malignancy to evaluate preoperative ultrasound and intraoperative findings. Macroscopic findings by a consultant pathologist were recorded from the reports. The subsequent microscopic findings from these cases were reassessed to determine whether any lesions of clinical importance were identified.

Results: A total of 326 cases of gallbladder specimens were subjected to histopathological examination within the study period. Twenty seven percent ( n=88) were males and 73 %( n=238) were females with age range from 54 years to 80 years (average 62 years).
Chronic cholecystitis was the most common findings with about 84.7% of cases (n=276), followed by acute cholecystitis14.7% (n=48). Only two of the gall bladders showed adenocarcinoma (0.6%), which was preoperatively diagnosed on ultrasound findings and suspected on gross/macroscopic examination.

Conclusions: Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal cholecystectomy specimens does not contribute to patient management and a more selective approach should be considered. This will reduce the burden on pathology departments, along with considerable cost containment.

Key words: Cholecystectomy, histopathology, gall bladder carcinoma.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Madiha Sajjad
Articles by Rehan Ahmed Khan
Articles by Samina Iltaf
on Google
on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ. 2012; 37(2): 172-175.


Web Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=12511 [Access: December 06, 2023].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ. 2012; 37(2): 172-175.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ. (2012), [cited December 06, 2023]; 37(2): 172-175.



Harvard Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf (2012) Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. RMJ, 37 (2), 172-175.



Turabian Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. 2012. Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. Rawal Medical Journal, 37 (2), 172-175.



Chicago Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. "Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?." Rawal Medical Journal 37 (2012), 172-175.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf. "Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?." Rawal Medical Journal 37.2 (2012), 172-175. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Madiha Sajjad, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Samina Iltaf (2012) Microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal gall bladder specimens: Is it worth the trouble?. Rawal Medical Journal, 37 (2), 172-175.