ISSN 0303-5212
 
2024, Vol: 49, Issue: 1
49 / 1Current Issue Online FirstArchiveAims and ScopeAbstracting & IndexingMost Accessed ArticlesMost Downloaded ArticlesMost Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Author_ Certificate.docx
Bank Reciept

Original Research 
RMJ. 2009; 34(2): 151-154


Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari.

Abstract
Objective
To determine the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation using
GlideScope® videolaryngoscope in patients with ischemic heart diseases.
Methods
In a randomized clinical trial, 80 adult patient, candidate for coronary artery bypass graft
surgery were allocated in two groups for laryngoscopy (MC=Macintosh blade or
GS=GlideScope). The hemodynamic response, laryngoscopy time, success rate and
complication rate were compared.
Results
Two patients were excluded because of long postoperative intubation period.
Demographic data and airway characteristics were comparable. There was no failed
intubation. Laryngoscopy time in MC group was shorter than GS group (14.50±8.30
versus 48.80±47.82 respectively, p=0.001). Stylet was used commonly and more attempts
to intubation were done in GS group. Hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation in
1, 5 and 15 min following intubation was not different between two groups.
Conclusions
GlideScope® technique did not have any benefit and increased laryngoscopy time, need
to use stylet and required more attempts. (Rawal Med J 2009;34: ).

Key words: Tracheal intubation, laryngoscopy, Macintosh blade, GlideScope, ischemic heart disease.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Eisa Bilehjani
Articles by Solmaz Fakhari
on Google
on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. RMJ. 2009; 34(2): 151-154.

Web Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. https://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=6922 [Access: December 06, 2023].

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. RMJ. 2009; 34(2): 151-154.


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. RMJ. (2009), [cited December 06, 2023]; 34(2): 151-154.


Harvard Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari (2009) Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. RMJ, 34 (2), 151-154.


Turabian Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. 2009. Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. Rawal Medical Journal, 34 (2), 151-154.


Chicago Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. "Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope." Rawal Medical Journal 34 (2009), 151-154.


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari. "Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope." Rawal Medical Journal 34.2 (2009), 151-154. Print.


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Eisa Bilehjani, Solmaz Fakhari (2009) Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in ischemic heart disease: Macintosh blade versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. Rawal Medical Journal, 34 (2), 151-154.


Author LoginReviewer LoginEditorial PoliciesConflict of Interest PolicyPlagiarism PolicyAdvertising Policy

About Rawal Medical Journal

Publication, subscription and Editorial office PMA House G/220-B Liaquat Road, Rawalpindi. Phone: 051-555-9812, Fax: 051-553-7088 Email: drnkhokhar@ya ... Read more.



For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.

Contact Information