Open Access and Peer-reviewed
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal News & Announcements


Original Research 
RMJ. 2010; 35(2): 180-183


Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah.

Abstract
ABSTRACT

Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of lateral internal sphincterotomy versus chemical (topical 0.2% glycerltrinitrate ointment) sphincterotomy for the treatment of anal fissure.
Methods
This was a comparative, prospective study of 342 patients of acute and chronic anal fissure, conducted at Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College Hospital Sukkur, during a period of three years from July 2007 to June 2010. Chemical sphinterotomy was advised to 233 patients with 0.2% glyceryltrinitrate ointment applied at fissure site twice or thrice a day for eight weeks. 109 patients were in urgency due to severe pain or refused topical treatment and underwent surgical sphincterotomy. The lateral internal sphincterotomy was done in 272 patients, including the failure/persistent fissures treated by glyceryltrinitrate. The patients were followed and the extent of improvement in presenting symptoms, side effects and complication of both modalities were recorded.
Results
Chemical sphincterotomy relieved symptoms in only 70 (30.04%) patients while laternal internal sphincterotomy in all 272 (100%) patients. In the former, the recurrence/persistence of fissure was found in 163 (69.95%) patients while none of the patients treated by surgical sphincterotomy suffered from the recurrence/persistence of the fissure. Except for bleeding in 4.77%, hematoma in 1.47%, faecal soiling in 6.98% and transient flatus incontinence in 2.57%, no failure or longterm complications like faecal incontinence were observed in patients treated by lateral internal sphincterotomy after mean follow up of 24 months.
Conclusion
Chemical sphincterotomy is a non-invasive, cost-effective and first line of treatment for anal fissure but lateral internal sphincterotomy was superior, more effective and curative than the chemical sphincterotomy. (Rawal Med J 2010;35: ).
Key words
Anal fissure, chemical sphincterotomy, lateral internal sphincterotomy.
INTRODUCTION
An anal fissure is a painful linear tear or split in the long axis of the distal anal canal1 below the level of the dentate line and extending to the anal verge.2,3 Possible causes include infection and trauma to the anal canal such as passage of hard stool or severe diarrhea. It is associated with increased tone of internal anal sphincter and poor perfusion of anterior and posterior anoderm. More than 90% of fissures are acute and resolve spontaneously. Acute anal fissures progress to chronic if not treated properly.4 About 90% of anal fissures occur in posterior midline.5
Chemical sphincterotomy (topical application of 0.2% glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) ointment) is emerging as first line treatment as it relaxes the sphincter.6-9 It is economical and cost-effective, but takes longer time for the healing and causes headache.9,10 Surgery is invasive, expensive and associated with postoperative pain7,11 but is now considered the treatment of choice for anal fissure, as it addresses the pathologically raised pressure withi

Key words: Anal fissure, chemical sphincterotomy, lateral internal sphincterotomy.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
Print this article Print this Article
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Muhammad Rafique Memon
Articles by Saima Arshad
Articles by Ali Gohar Bozdar
Articles by Syed Qarib Abbas Shah
on Google
on Google Scholar
Article Statistics
 Viewed: 8324
Downloaded: 760
Cited: 0


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. RMJ. 2010; 35(2): 180-183.


Web Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. http://www.rmj.org.pk/?mno=3792 [Access: February 21, 2019].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. RMJ. 2010; 35(2): 180-183.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. RMJ. (2010), [cited February 21, 2019]; 35(2): 180-183.



Harvard Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah, (2010) Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. RMJ, 35 (2), 180-183.



Turabian Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. 2010. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. Rawal Medical Journal, 35 (2), 180-183.



Chicago Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. "Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure." Rawal Medical Journal 35 (2010), 180-183.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah,. "Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure." Rawal Medical Journal 35.2 (2010), 180-183. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Muhammad Rafique Memon, Saima Arshad, Ali Gohar Bozdar, Syed Qarib Abbas Shah, (2010) Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy Versus Chemical Sphincterotomy in anal fissure. Rawal Medical Journal, 35 (2), 180-183.








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


Indexed in WHO Index Medicus IMEMR, Emromedex, Pakmedinet, ExtraMED and Scopus

  Approved by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan and Pakistan Medical and Dental Council


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES
STATEMENTS

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.

The articles in Rawal Medical Journal are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.